Rapid adaptation in online pragmatic interpretation of contrastive prosody
نویسندگان
چکیده
The realization of prosody varies across speakers, accents, and speech conditions. Listeners must navigate this variability to converge on consistent prosodic interpretations. We investigate whether listeners adapt to speaker-specific realization of prosody based on recent exposure and, if so, whether such adaptation is rapidly integrated with online pragmatic processing. We used the visual-world paradigm to investigate effects of prosodic cue reliability on the real-time interpretation of the construction “It looks like an X” pronounced either with (a) a H* pitch accent on the final noun, or (b) a contrastive L+H* pitch accent on looks and a rising boundary tone, a contour that can support a complex contrastive inference (e.g., It LOOKS like a zebra...(but it is not)). Eye-movements suggest that listeners process the L+H* on looks as an early cue to a contrastive interpretation. This effect, however, diminished when listeners had been exposed to the same speaker using the L+H* accent infelicitously (e.g., Show me the blue square. Now, show me the BLUE circle). We argue that the process of prosodic interpretations is modulated by the reliability of prosodic cue values, enabling listeners to navigate variability in prosody across speakers and contexts.
منابع مشابه
Pragmatic interpretation of contrastive prosody: It looks like speech adaptation
Drawing on insights from recent work on phonetic adaptation, we examined how listeners interpret prosodic cues to two opposing pragmatic meanings of the phrase “It looks like an X” (e.g., “It looks like a zebra (and it is one)” and “It LOOKS like a zebra (but its actually not)”. After establishing that different prosodic contours map onto these meanings (Experiment 1), we demonstrated that pros...
متن کاملContextual inferences over speakers' pragmatic intentions: Preschoolers' comprehension of contrastive prosody
We investigate pre-schoolers’ ability in drawing pragmatic inferences based on prosodic information. Previous work has found that young children are generally oblivious to intonational meaning of utterances. In particular, the ability to comprehend contrastive prosody develops late during language acquisition (after the age of 6). In three experiments, we show that preschoolers can engage in pr...
متن کاملIncremental processing in the pragmatic interpretation of contrastive prosody
We present an eye-tracking experiment investigating the time course with which listeners derive pragmatic inferences from contextual information. We used as a test case the construction “It looks like an X” pronounced either with (a) a nuclear pitch accent on the final noun, or (b) a contrastive L+H* pitch accent and a rising boundary tone, a contour that can support a complex contrastive infer...
متن کاملUncorrected Proof. Making Disjunctions Exclusive
This work examines how people interpret the sentential connective “or”, which can be viewed either inclusively (A or B or both) or exclusively (A or B but not both). Following up on prior work concerning quantifiers (Noveck, 2001; Noveck & Posada, 2003; Bott & Noveck, 2004) which shows that the common pragmatic interpretation of “some,” some but not all, is conveyed as part of an effortful step...
متن کاملIs it or isn't it: listeners make rapid use of prosody to infer speaker meanings.
A visual world experiment examined the time course for pragmatic inferences derived from visual context and contrastive intonation contours. We used the construction It looks like an X pronounced with either (a) a H(*) pitch accent on the final noun and a low boundary tone, or (b) a contrastive L+H(*) pitch accent and a rising boundary tone, a contour that can support contrastive inference (e.g...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014